Feo's Stuff

SCIENCE MOMENT

PANDORUM REVIEWS SCARY TOP 10 SCIENCE MOMENT UNFAIR RACIAL CLICHÉ ALERT
FEO FEED BACK?
NEWS?
SUBMISSIONS?

Write Me:
Feo Amante

Be sure to write: Feo Reader in the subject line else you may be bounced like JunkeMail.
SUBMISSION
GUIDELINES
ARCHIVE NEWS
SITE BIO
SPECIAL REPORT ARCHIVE

MOVIES
REVIEWS
INTERVIEWS
SCIENCE MOMENT
TOP TEN SCARY MOVIES
UNFAIR RACIAL CLICHÉ ALERT
RACIAL CLICHÉ RESPONSE
FEO AMANTE THEATER
My Short Film
LAST CALL

COMICS
REVIEWS

CONS
ROAD TRIP TIPS

HORRIBLE NEWS
ARCHIVE
CHAT SNATCH

STORY TIME
FEO TALES
REVIEWS

Link to us!
Feo Amante mini banner
If you would like to use the graphic above, just save the icon image to your server and link it back to feoamante.com!

Movies Eddie McMullen Jr. Science Moment by
E.C.McMullen Jr.
Bookmark and Share
Fandango - Movie Tickets Online
Pandorum
PANDORUM - 2009
Story: Travis Milloy, Christian Alvart
Screenwriter: Travis Milloy
Director: Christian Alvart
Producers: Paul W.S. Anderson, Jeremy Bolt, Robert Kulzer, Martin Moszkowicz
Studios: Constantin Film Produktion, Impact Pictures

I Get Email

Science and technology aren't always the same thing. Science can be about theories and ideas that have no real world applications. Technology on the other hand, deals with solving scientific engineering problems that produces actual material results. I'd like to focus on a major plot device in PANDORUM which employs the ever present use of Chem-lights.

Chem-lights or Chemiluminescence (chemically created light), patented by Omniglow and manufactured in 1986 under such names as Cyalume and Snaplight (to name a few), is an old technology based upon chemical reaction. You break a chemical containing capsule, which is floating in another chemical, and when the two touch they produce light for a short period of time. Eventually when the chemical reaction stabilizes and becomes inert, the light goes permanently "off".

Would this old tech still be around in 175 years? Unlikely as the tech is already moving into obsolescence by recent advances such as Electroluminescence, from companies such as CK Krill light sticks. Krill take up no more room than chem-lights, and produce illumination that can last as much as 27 times longer than chemlights - and you don't break anything. But even those will soon be obsolete due to the type of old fashioned battery it uses.

Modern advances in longer life battery storage (since 2005 we've had batteries that can be ink-jet printed onto paper), ever advancing nanotechnology, and even the ability to genetically and safely make animals produce their own light, makes the idea of future astronauts, nearly two centuries from now, having to rely on something as quaint as a chem-light, amusing in a mocking-your-movie kind of way.

Imagine watching a movie about the ISS space station. The power goes out and the researchers onboard have to rely on light from a... whale oil lantern? Seriously, wouldn't it still seem out of place for researchers on a modern day space station to rely on candles or the more relatively modern tech of a kerosene lantern? And yet in PANDORUM, there they are, almost 2 centuries into the future, aboard an intergalactic starship, and running around with something as anachronistic as Snaplights.

It made sense in DESCENT, but that film takes place in the now, not the nearly 200 years from now.

As for the beginning of PANDORUM and our earth having too many people and so, running out of resources?

Consider that the film makes plain from the very start that in the future, we are flying all over the solar system.

All Over It.

Then we are flying around OTHER solar systems. In our solar system alone, there is enough minerals, gases, and even water to amply supply the needs of as many people as could be living on earth. In fact, there is so much that you could build several more entire earths! Earth, if you haven't noticed, is quite tiny when compared to other planets in the solar system. And even with all of this abundance of resources within in our solar system? That doesn't even include the massive resources on the outer reaches of our solar system in the Kuiper Belt~, which surrounds our planetary solar system. And even the Kuiper Belt is within the larger Scattered Disc, which surrounds that.

What's more, there is the hypothesized massive Oort cloud^ that may contain our relatively disc shaped solar system, and its belt, within its sphere. In fact, the Oort cloud may extend about 3 light years in all directions. Even if it should turn out that the Oort doesn't exist, between the planets, the debris, and the Kuiper and Scattered Disc, we may leave our solar system to colonize other planets, but there will never be a reason to leave our solar system because we ran out of resources.

Also, we have the technology to terraform planets and build spaceship colonies Right Now (actually we've had it since the 1970s). The problem isn't technology, the problem is justifying cost. In fact, the Chinese government is planning, Right Now, to colonize and terraform the Moon and Mars (they've been very public about it*). So why, nearly two centuries from now, would we need to search far into our own galaxy or others to find an "earth-like" planet?

Finally, and this is the most painful lapse of science, the Elysium is supposedly in another solar system. No solar systems near us have earth-like planets. They don't even have Sol-like stars. Yet the spaceship is also supposed to be 500 million miles away.

Ahem.

Which puts the Elysium somewhere between the orbits of Jupiter (483 million miles from the sun) and Saturn (837 million miles). I swear, there are no other solar systems in that area.

Including the hypothetical Oort cloud, from end to end our solar system alone is well over 17 TRILLION miles across. And whether or not there actually is an Oort cloud, for a fact there are no other solar systems in that whole region. Any other star within 3 light years of us would be plainly visible in the daytime sky, as well as having a profound effect on our own solar system.

~
Discovered in 1992 by MIT astronomer David Jewitt and then-graduate student Jane Luu, and named after Dutch born, American Astronomer, Gerard Kuiper.

^
The Oort cloud is named after Dutch Astronomer, Jan Hendrick Oort.

*
How Terraforming Mars Will Work

China's ambitious plans in space

China may set up moon base camp by 2030



I GET EMAIL

When it comes to Science Fiction movies, PANDORUM was one of the most uneducated pieces of drivel I've seen in years. And when you think of all of the poorly educated Hollywood Science Fiction movies, and especially in a year that saw the SciFi fantasy release of the all new STAR TREK, that's saying something.

Yet even the most witless Science Fiction movies can engage scientific debate. Possibly because there is so much wrong that it takes so much to set right.

I received the following email from Feo Amante visitor Pierre Fabre. While it is his email and words, his thoughts may be shared by many who read my review and Science Moment.

Subject: Pandorum Science Moment----Science Nerd?

Some cosmology corrections:

you state that any other star that was THREE LIGHT YEARS away, "would be plainly visible in the daytime sky, as well as having a profound effect on our own solar system." Sure, they maybe aren't at THREE light years, but alpha proxima is 4.1 light years away and the STAR SYSTEM alpha centauri is 4.3 light years (about 41 trillion miles) away, and they have none of the 'profound effects' you predict. Light years are fairly large units of measure.

If you need to hire a science nerd to check your facts I'd be happy to help.

cheers,

Pierre Fabre

ps. Also in the same article: earth is the largest rocky planet in our solar system and I don't really see us mining gas giants such as jupiter, saturn, uranus, or neptune within a couple of hundred years....the gravitation involved is prohibitive to say the least, so, no, we are not a tiny planet in a solar system abundant in large ones....we are, in fact, sitting on the largest of the colonizable, minable, planets.

Hi Pierre,

I hope you are enjoying my website. Now my response to your letter.

Pierre: "Light years are fairly large units of measure."

Feo: Indeed they are. They are so large, that if the Alpha Centauri star system were just 1.3 light years closer, then it would be siphoning matter off of the Oort cloud, which in turn would likely siphon matter off of our Kuiper belt, which would have a profound effect on our solar system. Unless the Oort cloud doesn't exist, which would add to our understanding of our solar system. But in reality, the closest star, over a light year from the farthest reaches of our solar system, isn't close enough for it's gravity to profoundly affect us.

Also, a light year is 5,903,026,326,254.67 miles.
gsfc.nasa.gov/
4.3 times that is 25,383,013,202,895.081 or over 25 trillion miles, not about 41 trillion miles. Perhaps you meant to say "the STAR SYSTEM alpha centauri is 4.3 light years (about 43 trillion kilometers) away" and not miles?

If YOU need to hire a science nerd to check YOUR facts I'd be happy to help. :)

Pierre: "I don't really see us mining gas giants"

I made no mention of us mining gas giants. Understand that the grand total of all of our mining, all of our digging and building, metals, coal, everything, from the very beginning in prehistoric times, 43 thousand years ago (Lion Cave, Swaziland), accounts for far less than 1% of the earth's total surface. I'm not even talking about less than 1% of the earth's crust (about ten miles thick overall). I'm just talking about the surface: few mines go even 1 mile deep. At least 43,000 years of mining! When it comes to resources, we have truly barely scratched the surface.

So there is ample mining to be done on other moons. What little there is in the asteroid belt alone could possibly serve us for nearly one thousand years. That doesn't even take into account terraforming and colonizing Mars or building space colonies. And we still have the resources of moons around Jupiter, Saturn - just those alone would be more than enough for us to build and colonize space in O'Neill ships.

Hard core Science Fiction writer, Fredrick Pohl's 1992 novel, Mining the Oort, supposed exactly what I mentioned in my Science Moment. In his novel, the hypothetical Oort cloud has more than enough for all of the colonized planets and colony ships.

More on the stars of the Alpha Centauri system.
Alpha Centauri 3

A few good science books to read on the subject
MINING THE SKY:
Untold Riches From The Asteroids, Comets, And Planets
by
John S. Lewis
THE HIGH FRONTIER:
Human Colonies in Space
by
Gerard K. O'Neill

ISLANDS IN THE SKY:
Bold New Ideas for Colonizing Space
by
Robert Zubrin

ENTERING SPACE:
Creating a Spacefaring Civilization
by
Robert Zubrin
CENTAURI DREAMS: Imagining and Planning Interstellar Exploration
by
Paul Glister


Thanks for visiting Pierre! I hope you'll continue to enjoy feoamante.com and The Science Moment!


This article copyright 2009 E.C.McMullen Jr.

Bookmark and Share

Return to Movies

DVD


BLU-RAY


SNAPLIGHTS


TRIVIA

PANDORUM
(
like THE FINAL DESTINATION and 9 movies released earlier this year) was released in some theaters using the new D-Box Motion Code experience. What is that? It's a specially designed theater chair that, in response to encoded movies, sends waves of vibrations across your seat cushion to highlight certain parts of the film.

With D-Box you not only see and hear the movie, but now you can actually sit and feel the movie:
In Your ASS!

 

 

Feo Amante's Horror Home Page and feoamante.com are owned and copyright 1997 - 2011 by E.C.McMullen Jr.
All images and text belong to E.C.McMullen Jr. unless otherwise noted.
All fiction stories belong to their individual authors.
I will take you home...