SPIDER-MAN 2 - 2004
MGM
Rating: USA: PG |
|
Okay, they made a sequel. And I know what you're going to ask so let's just get this
out of the way right up front. You want to know: is there a Stan Lee cameo?
Yes. Yes, there is.
SPIDER-MAN 2 was directed, once again, by Sam Raimi (THE
EVIL DEAD, THE EVIL DEAD II, ARMY OF DARKNESS, THE GIFT, SPIDER-MAN) and written by Alvin Sargent (with a whole committee of people getting
various story credits, including Stan Lee). Tobey Maguire (SPIDER-MAN)
is back as the superhuman webslinger.
It's two years after the spider bite that made Pete Parker into Spiderman and we
learn right away one of the major problems with being a superhero: they
don't get paid. He may be able to survive ten story falls and bend steel
bars but Peter Parker is still a starving student living in New York (not
a cheap town). He works as a pizza delivery boy, lives in a crappy
one-room apartment and is getting bad grades because he can't do his homework
because he's out saving the world every night.
Leading this double life is really taking its toll on his sanity. Peter stares
longingly at the billboard ads that have pictures of his childhood sweetheart,
Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst: INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE, THE CROW: SALVATION, SPIDER-MAN),
who's modeling and acting career has really taken off. But he resolved
never to tell her his true feelings because people in his life are in
danger.
His feelings are hardly a secret though - as his wealthy friend Harry Osborn (James
Franco: SPIDER-MAN) points out. Harry inherited his father's company
after his father, Norman Osborn (Willem Dafoe in
the first movie) died. Norman Osborn went insane after an experiment
went wrong and turned him into the Green Goblin. He died fighting Spiderman
and Harry hates Spiderman for that reason.
Harry is also unsure what to make of the fact that his pal Peter always seems to
get pictures of Spiderman (for his other job: freelance
news photographer), implying he might know who Spiderman is (ha!).
Just whose side is Peter on, anyway? One more relationship strained by Peter's double life.
Speaking of experiments gone wrong: Harry's company is funding the research of
Dr. Otto Octavius (Alfred Molina: RAIDERS OF THE
LOST ARK, SPECIES, IDENTITY). Doc
Ock (as he's known later) is working on a
fusion power source that uses tritium to create a mini sun in an alarmingly
open machine (open in the sense that something as
truly dangerous as a large ball of fusion plasma would normally be carefully
contained). By a happy coincidence, Peter is writing a long overdue
physics paper on the Doctor's work so Harry invites Peter to the demo
of the new invention.
A much more impressive invention is casually brought out during the fusion demonstration.
For a poorly explained reason the good doctor uses an amazing four-steel-tentacle
prosthetic when he runs the fusion generator to "help contain the
magnetic fields" or something like that. These arms are controlled
by their own artificial intelligence, which connects to Doc Ock's brain
by nanowires that penetrate his spine. Ouch. And when the assembled news
crews see this device an unusually astute reporter provides a key bit
of exposition by asking the Doc how he keeps the tentacle AI from taking
over his mind. Why, with this handy "inhibitor chip" right here
on the device. I think we all see where that's going.
This movie tries and mostly succeeds to be more dramatic and true to life than the
first film while still being very comic book. On the one hand there is
great conflict in Peter's life as he struggles with the decision of just
who he is and what he wants to do. He very much wants a normal life but
the "with great power comes great responsibility" theme keeps
bringing him back to his alter ego. On the other hand there are very over
the top, comic book moments, especially with Peter's boss at the Daily
Bugle, Jonah Jameson (J.K. Simmons: THE GIFT).
Sometimes a mixed style like that can be a disaster but here it works pretty well.
A few small points bother me, like did Mary Jane's boyfriend really need
to be a soldier/football hero/astronaut just back from the moon? And would
the police, while trying to capture Doc Ock, really just start shooting
while he's climbing a building, not caring that bullets were going through
windows and probably killing innocent bystanders?
But as always, what really bothers me can only be expressed in a
!!!SCIENCE MOMENT!!!:
There were a variety of mistakes and poorly thought out details. Here's
the most obvious, in no particular order.
1. What is the power source for Doc Ock's tentacles? Just because he can control them with
his thoughts doesn't explain where their energy comes from.
Continued at the SCIENCE MOMENT.
But adding it all up, the excellent conflict, the occasional bad science, the interesting
cameos (watch for Bruce Campbell of EVIL DEAD fame)
and the cool effects, make this a pretty cool movie. I give it four shriek
girls.
This review
copyright 2004 E.C.McMullen Jr.
Return to Movies
|
