Feo Amante's Web Shoppe SCIENCE IN MOVIES
- 2005 to 2007 -
SCIENCE MOMENT SCIENCE STUFF UNFAIR RACIAL CLICHÉ ALERT SCARY TOP 10 REVIEWS BY ALPHABET REVIEWS BY VARMINTS

Comics, Graphic Novels, and Anime

Horror, Thriller, Suspense, and Mystery Movies

Literature and Writers

Conventions

 

 

SCIENCE Movies MOMENT

SPOILERS AHEAD!

!!!SCIENCE MOMENT 2000!!!

BEWARE THE SCIENCE FROM THESE TITLES OF THE

1950s - 1960s - 1970s - 1980s - 1990s - 2000s

2000 to 2002
2003 to 2004
2005 to 2006
2007 to 2008

17 MOMENTS OF SCIENCE AND COUNTING!

 

FEED BACK?
Write Us:

Feo Amante
Be sure to write:
Feo Reader
in the subject line else you may be bounced like JunkeMail

BATMAN BEGINS (2005)
Part of the plot depends on a microwave beam weapon meant to vaporize water (supposedly so the military can "destroy an enemy's water supply"). The basic idea is sound - in fact that's how your microwave oven works. The microwaves are tuned to heat water. But the way the beam weapon is shown in use is just plain wrong.

A powerful microwave beam could certainly vaporize water but it wouldn't start a "chain reaction" in the water supply. And it wouldn't just produce steam - it'd produce super-heated steam which is nearly invisible and very dangerous. I also must mention that your body has lots of water in it and the people in the path of the beam should have, well, exploded.

 

LAND OF THE DEAD (2005)
One of the cool things about all the Dead movies is that exactly why the zombies have appeared is never explained. I was hoping after twenty years that Romero would at least drop a few hints but that doesn't happen, so all I can do is speculate. I don't know how you could provide enough energy to maintain bodily animation after death (and after the resulting cellular damage from lack of oxygen), especially since the zombies don't breathe and hardly ever eat (most people are long gone and yet months or years later the zombies are still walking around). Some people like to wave their arms and shout "nanotechnology" but that's not a workable answer. Nanotech isn't magic and though it can do many things, it can't supply limitless energy from nothing. In fact, magic is the only answer I can think of.

 

WAR OF THE WORLDS (2005)
At one point a character says, "This isn't a war, anymore than there's a war between men and maggots." But the alien technology is just advanced, not god-like, and really not even all that advanced. Maybe a century - certainly not much more than that.

 

CUBE ZERO (2005)
The traps in CUBE were diabolical but perfectly believable. Here they're more cartoonish. For example, the flesh eating bacteria is plenty nasty but nowhere near as fast acting as we see in CUBE ZERO. None of them stretch my suspension of disbelief to the breaking point, but they come pretty close.

 

THE ISLAND (2005)
The central theme is out of date. Research into adult stem cells will very shortly make the whole plot here obsolete and that's all I'll say about that.

The only other thing I want to mention is that the reason Lincoln turns out to know more than he should know under the circumstances is never explained and could only happen by magic, not science.

The Cave

PARASITE REX: Inside the Bizarre World of Nature's Most Dangerous Creatures
THE CAVE (2005)
I must admit that the parasite as the cause is mostly believable. Parasites are quite capable of altering their hosts to suit their own needs (Read "Parasite Rex" by Carl Zimmer to find out just how weird parasites are). That being said, the idea that a parasite would alter its human hosts into large predators in order to survive in a cave doesn't really make sense. Turning them into big moles would have fit the environment better (like in THE MOLE PEOPLE). Giving them wings was just over the top but I can let that go. What I can't let go is the implication at one point in the movie that the parasite is intelligent and that it has "plans." That's just silly.

A lot of other small details bothered me, like the way we hear the cavers talking to each other by radio while diving even though they have regular diving equipment, not air-tight helmets like Cameron invented for THE ABYSS. So how are they talking with a big piece of rubber in their mouths? It also bothered me when we see the special effect meant to represent the monster's sonar vision, because the monster's sonar is apparently bouncing off the beams of light from their flashlights. It obviously shouldn't have "seen" the lights.

A SOUND OF THUNDER (2005)
I could write a book about everything this movie got wrong. It's almost an anti-science lesson. Virtually every time a character opens their mouth and says something even remotely scientific it's not just wrong - it's way wrong. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is completely misstated, the many mentions of evolution don't even come close and their descriptions of the rules of time travel within the movie are contradictory.

A few examples:

First, they shoot the dinosaurs with "gauss rifles". This implies the rifles are rail guns: they use electromagnetic force to fire a projectile. But their bullets are frozen nitrogen (so they'll evaporate and thus leave no trace behind, which is stupid because you still leave nitrogen molecules from the 21st century behind whether they're in solid or gaseous form) which is quite useless in a rail gun since it's not remotely magnetic. That's why rail guns use metal projectiles.

Second, they make it clear that if they can fix the problem with the timeline they won't remember that history has been changed back. That makes sense. But then why are they aware that history has been altered in the first place? When history gets screwed up everybody notices immediately.

Third, as history starts changing and new plants and animals begin appearing, Sonia says humans will be the last animal affected because we were the "last to evolve." No, we most certainly were not. Evolution is a dynamic process, taking place constantly throughout nature. There's nothing special or amazing (from nature's point of view) about the appearance of our species. Lots of others have appeared in the 200,000 years since we showed up.

 

The Beast of Bray Road
THE BEAST OF BRAY ROAD (2005)
I hope I don’t ruin the story for you if I say science doesn’t really apply to the Beast. That’s all I’ll say about that. I do want to mention something that a character in this movie says and that is often said by characters in sci-fi and horror whenever the writer wants them to seem “scientific”. The phrase (often attributed to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes) is, “When you’ve eliminated all the other possibilities, whatever is left, no matter how unbelievable, is the answer.” That’s stupid, because it assumes you are aware of all the possibilities – that you haven’t missed anything. The answer could easily be something you didn’t think of.

 

The XMen III
XMEN III: THE LAST STAND (2006)
Magneto’s power is the ability to generate powerful magnetic fields and this is always shown by having him move metal around. But magnets can do more than that. There are a lot of experiments going on with TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation). Properly applied magnetic fields can alter the electrical fields in your brain and activate or de-activate specific brain areas. It would take some experimentation, something Magneto is not shy about, but his power should also allow him to alter the emotions of the people around him. Beyond that, very strong magnetic fields are fatal for cordate life forms because your spinal fluid is slightly magnetic. Ouch.

 

Masters of Horror
THE SCREWFLY SOLUTION (2006)
The basic idea here, taken from Sheldon’s short story, is brilliant and perfectly workable. A handy way to clear the annoying humans from the planet is to get all the men to kill all the women and then just wait for the men to die of old age. It avoids all the mess of actual invasion.

But could a virus turn a man into a serial killer? Sure, if you assume that the difference between a normal man and a serial killer is some physical deformity of the brain. Once you know the cause, designing a virus that induces it is quite plausible.

Children of Men
CHILDREN OF MEN (2006)
I’m not going to discuss the worldwide infertility very much, only because it’s never explained so I have no science to criticize. I will mention that I think if this actually happened that a variety of biological techniques (cloning, for example) could be used to prevent our extinction, but that’s a minor quibble.

The science I really want to talk about is demography (Read Mark Steyn's America Alone). Demography is the study of population trends and it’s related to my opening remark about people committing self-genocide. Did you know that Europe is dying? Japan too? No, I don’t mean from pollution (actually the world is quite a bit cleaner than it used to be). I mean that just to maintain a stable population you need 2.1 live births per woman. But for decades now the birth rate in all of Europe and in Japan has been well below that. More like 1.5 to 1.1 births per woman, or about half what you need to keep your population from shrinking.

That means that for every two Italians or Germans or Spaniards that die, only one new one is born. That means that every generation, their population is cut in half. That also means obstetricians are becoming hard to find because why would anyone want to go into a shrinking field like that?

 

The Host
THE HOST aka Gwoemul (2006)
Could chemicals dumped into a river cause the fish to mutate? Certainly. Would one of these mutations be a giant amphibious monster that likes to swing from bridge girders? Nope. Not a chance. Mutations do not work that way.

Nor was the director really implying that. This movie has a blatant political subtext along the lines of government indifference (specifically, American government indifference) toward the damage done to the environment deserves punishment. And nature will deliver this punishment by rising up and smiting innocent bystanders who never dumped anything anywhere. Or maybe that’s just my take on it.

Continue to
2007 t0 2008

Back to
MOVIES

LINKS TO THE FUTURE!

RETROFUTURE
See Yesterday's Tomorrow, TODAY!

MAN CONQUERS SPACE
What a beautiful future it was.

BUZZALDRIN
He walked on the moon!
He got Neil Armstrong to take his picture!
He became an MTV Award!
He flew Homer Simpson into space and put the "Buzz" in Buzz Lightyear!


SCIENCE LINKS!

A VOYAGE TO ARCTURUS
Strong math Techno-speak for the really smart Techno-Geek.

BAD ASTRONOMY
debunks the myths with clear, easy to understand facts.

BAD SCIENCE PROJECTS
The most fascinating research, experiments, and inventions in the world.
Lots of robots!

BETTER HUMANS

JUNK SCIENCE
debunks the myths and the myth makers.

MADSCI.org
Where your science questions are answered by REAL (though not necessarily mad) scientists!

NEW SCIENTIST

NUCLEAR SPACE

SCIENCEAGOGO
See Researchers, Professors, Scientists, and Science Geeks discuss chaos and particle theory (and more!) with bathroom language!
See flame wars on a doctorate level!
See Ph.D's discuss rabid liberal politics with no clue as to what they are talking about!

SCIENCE DAILY

SPACE

SPACEDAILY

TECH CENTRAL STATION

TERRESTRIAL MUSINGS
More blog for your bucK!


LINKS TO THE PAST!

NASA.gov
See history archived before your very eyes! NASA's own online mausoleum!

 
Feo Amante's Horror Home Page and feoamante.com are owned and copyright 1997 - 2007 by E.C.McMullen Jr.
All images and text belong to E.C.McMullen Jr. unless otherwise noted.
All fiction stories belong to their individual authors.
 
I will take you home...